Uganda’s persistent electricity blackouts have sparked fresh concerns over accountability in the power distribution sector, with reports claiming that Chief of Defence Forces Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba could move against senior officials of the Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited (UEDCL). The allegations have generated debate over whether the recurring interruptions are simply operational failures or whether deeper management and corruption concerns need to be investigated. However, claims that arrests are being planned remain unverified, and no official confirmation has been provided to establish that such action is imminent.
According to the circulating reports, Gen Muhoozi is reportedly concerned about the way some officials in the electricity sector conduct their responsibilities, particularly amid complaints about unreliable power supply. The reports raise allegations of possible corruption, mismanagement and questionable practices that could be affecting service delivery. If substantiated, such concerns would raise serious questions about the effectiveness of existing oversight mechanisms and whether those entrusted with managing the country’s electricity distribution network are meeting their obligations.
The continued power interruptions have become a major concern for households, traders, manufacturers and other businesses that depend on a stable electricity supply. Small businesses can lose customers and merchandise during prolonged outages, while manufacturers face production delays and additional expenses when forced to rely on generators. For ordinary Ugandans, unreliable electricity can disrupt daily activities, affect essential services and create uncertainty for people who depend on power to earn a living.
The situation has also prompted questions about whether the recurring blackouts could have broader implications for national security and economic stability. Electricity supports communication networks, commercial operations, public institutions and other essential services, making reliable distribution an important national priority. Nevertheless, the suggestion that the outages are being deliberately engineered by individuals with political or government connections remains an allegation that requires credible evidence and an independent investigation before any conclusions can be drawn.
Meanwhile, parliamentary scrutiny of the electricity sector has intensified following the transfer of distribution responsibilities from Umeme Limited to UEDCL after the expiry of Umeme’s 20-year concession in March 2025. The transition involved significant financial arrangements linked to the government’s takeover of the distribution operations and compensation for Umeme’s unrecovered investments. The Public Accounts Committee has reportedly questioned officials from the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development over discrepancies surrounding the financing of the transaction, placing renewed attention on the management of public resources.
During parliamentary proceedings, Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Eng. Irene Bateebe reportedly explained the sequence of events leading to the end of Umeme’s concession and the subsequent transfer of distribution responsibilities to UEDCL. The discussions have highlighted the importance of clear financial records, transparent decision-making and proper accountability during major public infrastructure transactions. Lawmakers are expected to seek explanations on outstanding questions surrounding the transition and the financial obligations associated with it.
The controversy has increased pressure on UEDCL and the relevant government institutions to explain the causes of persistent power interruptions and demonstrate what measures are being taken to improve reliability. Where credible evidence of corruption, negligence or deliberate interference emerges, the responsible authorities can pursue investigations and take appropriate action in accordance with the law. However, allegations against individual officials must be treated carefully, with investigations and due process establishing responsibility rather than speculation or unconfirmed reports.
For now, the suggestion that Gen Muhoozi could order or initiate arrests involving UEDCL officials remains unconfirmed. The immediate challenge for the electricity sector is to address consumers’ concerns, clarify the causes of the blackouts and provide transparent answers about the management of the distribution system and the Umeme transition. Whether the controversy leads to further investigations or official action will depend on verifiable evidence and statements from the relevant authorities. Until then, Ugandans are left demanding reliable electricity, greater transparency and accountability from the institutions responsible for keeping the country powered.
About the Author
