Retired Lt Gen Peter Elwelu has reportedly challenged Chief of Defence Forces Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba over claims that he had been demoted from his former military rank. Elwelu argues that the CDF has no authority to strip a retired officer of their rank, insisting that such a decision must be supported by the law.
“The CDF has absolutely no powers to strip a retired officer of their rank. At least not in our Constitution or any other laws of this country, Uganda,” Elwelu said in remarks attributed to him. His position questions the legal basis of Muhoozi’s reported declaration concerning his military status.
The dispute follows public statements in which Muhoozi reportedly claimed to have demoted Elwelu to the rank of Private. The remarks sparked debate because Elwelu previously served as Deputy Chief of Defence Forces, one of the senior positions within the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF).
Elwelu’s argument centres on whether the serving army chief can change the rank of an officer who has already retired from active service. By referring to the Constitution and Uganda’s laws, he is challenging the authority behind the reported decision rather than accepting the announcement as legally binding.
The disagreement has unfolded amid other public exchanges between the two military figures. Muhoozi has also reportedly demanded that Elwelu surrender, saying he wants to speak with the former deputy army chief. The circumstances behind the dispute and the legal status of any action against Elwelu remain matters requiring further clarification.
The issue raises questions about the procedures governing military ranks, retirement and disciplinary authority within Uganda’s armed forces. Whether a retired officer’s rank can be altered, and which authority would have the power to do so, depends on the applicable laws and regulations rather than statements made on social media alone.
Elwelu’s reported response adds a legal dimension to the controversy, placing emphasis on constitutional provisions and the limits of military authority. However, a definitive assessment of the dispute would require examination of the relevant legislation, military regulations and any formal orders that may have been issued.
Neither the precise legal basis for Muhoozi’s reported declaration nor the full details of Elwelu’s response have been established in the information provided. The central question remains whether any formal action has been taken against the retired general and, if so, whether it complies with Uganda’s legal framework governing military service and rank.
About the Author
