Minister for the Presidency Milly Babalanda has sent a strong message to supporters of Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s Patriotic League of Uganda (PLU), warning them against engaging in political activities that could create divisions within the ruling establishment. Babalanda insists that any political transition in Uganda must strictly follow the Constitution and established electoral procedures, stressing that no individual or political group should attempt to undermine the country’s existing leadership arrangements.
In an opinion article addressing the increasingly heated debate about Uganda’s political future, Babalanda acknowledged that discussions about succession were legitimate and that Ugandans had the freedom to express their views about future leadership. However, she cautioned that such discussions must be conducted responsibly without creating unnecessary political tension or disrespecting the current presidential mandate of Yoweri Kaguta Museveni.
The minister specifically referred to Article 105(1) of the Constitution, which provides for a five-year presidential term, arguing that Museveni remains the country’s duly elected President and that all government officials must respect the constitutional order. She maintained that political ambitions and discussions about future leadership should never become an excuse for disregarding the law or challenging the authority of the sitting President.
Babalanda’s remarks come amid growing disagreements among some NRM and PLU supporters over the timing and manner in which succession discussions should be conducted. Several government figures have expressed concern that promoting a post-Museveni political arrangement while the President is serving his current term could create confusion within the ruling party and weaken confidence in the country’s political stability.
Among those who have raised concerns are Older Persons representative for eastern Uganda Ofwono Opondo and presidential adviser Proscovia Nalweyiso. Opondo reportedly warned that aggressive succession campaigns could be interpreted as a sign of dissatisfaction with Museveni’s leadership, potentially creating uncertainty among Ugandans and investors. Nalweyiso, on the other hand, questioned why succession discussions were gaining momentum shortly after Museveni began a new term, urging NRM supporters to concentrate on implementing the 2026–2031 manifesto.
Babalanda also defended herself against criticism from some PLU supporters following her directive to Resident District Commissioners to remain loyal to the President and fulfil their responsibilities. Some supporters reportedly interpreted her position as an attempt to oppose Gen Muhoozi’s political ambitions. However, the minister rejected the interpretation, describing Muhoozi as her brother and appreciating his contribution to national security and the fight against corruption.
She further appealed to supporters of both the NRM and PLU to exercise restraint and avoid insults, intimidation and personal attacks as conversations about Uganda’s future leadership continue. According to Babalanda, supporting Museveni’s current administration does not necessarily mean opposing discussions about a future transition, provided such discussions are conducted within the boundaries of the law.
Her message appears to be a call for patience, constitutionalism and unity within the ruling establishment at a time when discussions about succession are attracting increasing public attention. Babalanda maintains that Uganda’s leadership transition must be determined through lawful constitutional and electoral processes rather than political pressure, confrontation or personal ambitions.
About the Author
