Political tensions within pro-government circles have intensified after outspoken figure Hon Justine Namere made sensational allegations against Hon Kabanda, accusing him of orchestrating a fraudulent scheme that allegedly cost President Yoweri Museveni over Shs500 million.
The shocking claims, shared in a widely circulated video, have triggered heated debate across social media platforms and political circles alike.
According to Namere, the controversy dates back to a secretive arrangement in which Kabanda allegedly introduced a woman to State House under questionable circumstances.
She claimed the woman was presented to President Museveni as a supposed second wife to National Unity Platform leader Robert Kyagulanyi, popularly known as Bobi Wine.
Namere alleged that the woman arrived with what she described as sensitive political intelligence concerning opposition activities ahead of the 2026 general elections. The claims reportedly suggested that some supporters of the opposition movement were planning violent unrest aimed at destabilizing the government after the elections.
The accusations allegedly created panic among senior officials who were already concerned about rising political pressure and growing protest sentiments within urban areas. According to Namere, the information presented to the president appeared credible enough to prompt immediate financial support for the woman.
She claimed President Museveni later authorized the release of more than Shs500 million to the woman as part of what was believed to be a sensitive security-related operation. However, Namere insists the entire arrangement was built on deception and manipulation.
In her explosive remarks, Namere alleged that after the money was secured, Kabanda allegedly seized control of the funds and denied the woman access to the cash. She further claimed the woman was intimidated and threatened with imprisonment in Luzira should she attempt to speak publicly about the matter.
The allegations have since fueled speculation about growing mistrust and internal divisions among influential figures aligned with government structures. Namere claimed the incident significantly damaged Kabanda’s credibility before the president and contributed to ongoing tensions within political circles.
She further accused Kabanda of harboring jealousy toward individuals who receive political favor or recognition within government ranks. According to her, this alleged behavior is partly responsible for his reported disagreements with Speaker Anita Among and other influential personalities.
Namere also linked the controversy to recent developments involving the Patriotic League of Uganda (PLU), suggesting that shifting alliances and power struggles are beginning to expose deeper cracks within sections of the ruling establishment.
Observers say the public fallout reflects broader competition for influence as political camps quietly reposition themselves ahead of the 2026 elections. The growing war of words between government supporters has increasingly become visible on social media and public platforms.
The recorded video has attracted massive public attention, with supporters and critics offering conflicting reactions regarding the credibility of Namere’s statements. While some praised her for exposing alleged corruption and deception, others questioned the motive behind her sudden revelations.
Neither Hon Kabanda nor State House had officially responded to the allegations by the time the remarks gained traction online. The absence of an immediate response only fueled further speculation and online debate surrounding the claims.
Political analysts argue that allegations involving misuse of security intelligence can have serious implications if proven true. They note that matters touching national security and State House operations often attract heightened public scrutiny because of their sensitivity.
Others believe the accusations highlight the growing dangers of misinformation within political systems, especially during periods of heightened electoral tension. False intelligence, analysts say, can influence state decisions and potentially undermine trust within institutions.
The controversy has also reignited discussions about accountability in the management of classified operations and public resources. Critics online questioned how such large sums of money could allegedly be released without thorough verification procedures.
Supporters of the opposition, meanwhile, dismissed the claims linking NUP supporters to violent plots, arguing that such accusations are frequently used to discredit political rivals and justify crackdowns on dissenting voices.
The unfolding dispute has further amplified conversations about the role of propaganda, political survival tactics, and internal rivalries within Uganda’s political landscape. Some commentators described the scandal as a reflection of intensifying battles for influence ahead of the next electoral cycle.
Namere maintained in her remarks that she possesses credible evidence supporting her allegations and suggested more revelations could emerge in the near future. Her statements have left many Ugandans waiting to see whether any official investigations or responses will follow.
As debate continues online, the allegations have become yet another chapter in Uganda’s increasingly dramatic political environment, where accusations, counterclaims, and power struggles frequently dominate public discourse.
For now, the explosive claims remain unverified publicly, but they have undoubtedly intensified attention on the relationships and trust dynamics among influential political actors surrounding the country’s leadership.
About the Author
